can we at least agree that naming it “the browser company” while building a new user interface on top of chromium is a little much
24 replies
I am just a boy standing in front of the internet, asking it to think about how “use-for-free” things are funded before you deeply integrate them into your daily workflow
@zachleat luckily no one has integrated this into anything, deeply or otherwise
@zachleat I fell for this one and I feel foolish.
I’m considering giving Vivaldi a try before returning to Firefox. The UI change of pace was stimulating.
@tylersticka @zachleat Yeah, Vivaldi looks real tempting right now.
I'm curious why none of the alt browsers use gecko under the hood? But I imagine the answer is depressingly "websites are built for chrome" 😞
(Not the ones @cloudfour and @OddBird make, though! Hooray for user choice! 🙂)
@mia @tylersticka @zachleat I did learn about Floorp recently https://floorp.app/en/
@zachleat gonna start a company for a new OS — but it'll just run on linux — and it shall be called “The OS Company”. you in?
@jimniels *runs away screaming*
@zachleat I dunno you shouldn't have to build a new rendering engine to explore new ways of thinking about the UX of browsing the web. I want more folks trying to innovate exactly in the space that Arc was playing in, between the rendering engine and the user.
(but also yes when your ideas about browsing the web are bad and harmful we could, we should, we're gonna, get yer ass)
@eeeps yeah, totally—I agree. Twas nothing more than a gripe about the hubris behind the name.
@zachleat Steve Jobs making fun of Dropbox for being a feature not a product and now folks getting VC money for data-hoovering browser skins.
@zachleat Arc is three Chrome tabs in a trench coat.
@zachleat Counterpoint: It's not called The Rendering Engine Company