28 replies

1. Dave 🧱 2 min later

   @zachleat wow they finally automated ‘the douchebag’

   1. Elwin van Eede 11 hr later

      @DavidDarnes @zachleat If it’s a public repo with mostly TypeScript then I don’t see nothing wrong with it, aside from wording maybe. At least it’s not blocking.

      1. Dave 🧱 11 hr later

         @elwinvaneede @zachleat I believe this is on Eleventy which has no TypeScript 😬

         1. Zach Leatherman 17 hr later

            @DavidDarnes @elwinvaneede no no, it’s another repo I don’t even commit to. Just saw a PR with this comment and enjoyed the passive wording. I think the bot is fine

2. Private reply 3 min later
   1. Private reply 3 min later
      1. Private reply 8 min later
      2. Private reply 56 min later
         1. Private reply 58 min later
            1. Private reply 2 hr later
3. Thomas Michael Semmler 5 min later

   @zachleat why is it doing that? The hell?

   1. Zach Leatherman 6 min later

      @nachtfunke I think it is a repo specific add-on

      1. Thomas Michael Semmler 8 min later

         @zachleat I see! I thought GitHub is out there shaming people into using typescript.

         I was already sharpening my pitchforks!

         1. Zach Leatherman 10 min later

            @nachtfunke haha no no put those pitchforks away

            1. Thomas Michael Semmler 18 min later

               @zachleat … for now

               😈

4. Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊) 5 min later

   @zachleat Which cursed GH action is this?!

   1. Zach Leatherman 9 min later

      @jaredwhite I think it’s a custom thing built on top of https://github.com/tj-actions/changed-files

5. Braw ☕🏳️‍🌈 8 min later

   @zachleat this would be reasonable in codebase that is already mostly TypeScript, but is it the case on the screenshot?

   1. Zach Leatherman 10 min later

      @brawaru yeah—you’re right. The repo is almost certainly TypeScript.

6. Matt Fantinel 14 min later

   @zachleat the more I use TypeScript the less I wanna use TypeScript (I fully understand Svelte's decision to use JSDoc instead)

   1. Zach Leatherman 17 min later

      @fantinel a very good compromise 👍🏻

7. Nick Nisi 3 days later

   @zachleat good advice! 😉

   1. Zach Leatherman 3 days later

      @nicknisi this one was Nick Nisi bait 😅

8. Brian LeRoux 💚 3 days later

   @zachleat consider increasing your maintenance burden

   1. Zach Leatherman 3 days later

      @brianleroux “we will pay you $1 now if you pay us $1000 later” DEAL—wait

      1. Brian LeRoux 💚 3 days later

         @zachleat nice stable package you have there have you considered introducing a build step and dependency known for shipping breaking changes on semver minor/patch?

         1. Zach Leatherman 3 days later

            @brianleroux how dare you bring next.js into this

            1. Brian LeRoux 💚 3 days later

               @zachleat the next version always fixes the last version but you need to suffer an apple style keynote with nft badge to find out how