9 replies

1. Potch 18 min later

   @zachleat I see `code_repository` here: https://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#HTML5_link_type_extensions

   1. Zach Leatherman 29 min later

      @potch thank you! I was hoping for a more granular way to link to a specific content file but this is another clue in my journey!

      1. Khalid ⚡ 52 min later

         @zachleat @potch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stSSWCJD710 maybe using this format?

         1. Zach Leatherman 1 hr later

            @khalidabuhakmeh @potch excellent cross reference, thank you!

      2. Chris 3 hr later

         @zachleat This page https://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#HTML5_link_type_extensions also suggests rel="source", https://adactio.com/journal/6667/

2. Zach Leatherman 28 min later

   Looks like @adactio suggested rel="source" in 2014: https://adactio.com/journal/6667

   1. Kelson 31 min later

      @zachleat @adactio It's logical, at least!

   2. Jason Garber 3 hr later

      @zachleat @adactio I’ve been using rel-source on my websites since seeing Jeremy’s article all those years ago. It’s great.

      …and also:

      At some point last year there was a bunch of pedantic whinging in the IndieWeb community/IRC/wherever about how “source” is the wrong word and I just kinda tuned out.

3. Jason Garber 3 hr later

   @zachleat Found it on the microformats wiki, under “brainstorming”…

   https://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values