I don’t know if this is a good decision but it also feels long overdue

56 replies
if you’re cold, your dependency is cold — bring them inside
-
@jamesdoc italic! …wait I misread the vibe
@zachleat big madlad energy
@zachleat sickos.gif
@zachleat rename it nuckles you coward
@jgarber well, wait… what is a nunjuck
@zachleat who can even say
@jgarber look, can we meet in the middle and call it nunstuck
@justsnook @jgarber nunjucks on the runjucks
@zachleat @justsnook more like funjucks amirite
@zachleat @justsnook @jgarber from nunjucks to funjucks
@zachleat compromise!
-
@zachleat As a multiple offender forker (!!), I approve this message. 😅
@zachleat Oh good. I can PR you a bunch of types for the parser ;)
maybe after that I'll see if i can get the parser to handle multiple error nodes
@konnorrogers we are in this together now
-
@konnorrogers go B.A.N.A.N.A.(s)!
-
@zachleat 11tyucks...wait
@darby3 we’ll iterate, it will get there
@zachleat 😱😍
Honestly it looks great but I would bet everything on https://vento.js.org!
@tommi 100% vento seems like a great bet to me
@zachleat nice.
we have liftoff
@zachleat i believe this now means there are too many jucks
@zachleat Oooh this is very good.
A few times at work, we've discussed dropping Nunjucks because of the lack of Mozilla support and the Nunjucks4 fork appearing to stall some time ago. A version of it being actively maintained would be huge for us.
@beeps yeah, I think it’s time. It’s the #1 template syntax that folks use in Eleventy so it makes sense
Made a lot of progress yesterday: https://github.com/11ty/nunjucks/
@zachleat It's great to see!
Is the plan to maintain it as-is or is there room for future feature additions?
@beeps I’ve already got most of the deps updated (though the test workflow needs updating)
but the next phase will likely be strictly bug fixes
then maybe we’ll talk about new features if it doesn’t turn out too terrible 😅