In my mind there are three kinds of feedback: criticism, indifference, and praise.
Well-run developer communities accept all three. Poorly-run communities optimize for only the latter.
Also posted to Bluesky.
16 replies
okay...but where does "snark" fit in?
I’m not sure if I’m ready to admit this but snark is participatory indifference
sometimes I post something that’s earnest which I know is very confusing
@zachleat The importance of being earnest.
@justsnook I too grew up on Jim Varney, thank you
@zachleat @justsnook knowutimean?
@jgarber @justsnook ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
@zachleat @justsnook Ernest Saves Christmas is a Christmas movie and none of us can change that.
@zachleat you must be a good person.
i’ve seen there’s also “disqualification”, when the person or system giving feedback wants to play, consciously or not, the zero-sum status game. i assume you add it to criticism and take the best out of it, which is a great strategy.
but knowing that in the world there’s both malice and people that play games, can help one make better decisions on who to, and who not to, look for feedback from.
@argonaut huh — yeah, I’ve seen that. I would say that no matter how successful you are, folks will find a way to disqualify you (if they want).
I would also just add one small little thing that I cringe a little bit when I hear someone qualified as “good” — good or bad is how we participate in a thing at a small scale, in the choices we make
@zachleat totally agree, i don’t see value in categorising as good or bad, i see value in what takes you closer or farther from what you expect, want, desire, search for, etc.
value judgements are always points of view and they move with strategy changes, popular opinion, overton windows… so usually of little valuable use.
thanks for using your platform to ruin my day 🥰
“be best” practices don’t work
Not a big fan of this post, but I don’t really care. Nice job, Zach!
I didn’t think you were particularly into running until I saw you run THE GAMUT