12 replies

1. Ethan Marcotte 10 min later

   @zachleat i do in my heart every single day, does that count

   1. Ethan Marcotte 10 min later

      @zachleat oh you said git

      1. Zach Leatherman 19 min later

         @beep I think yours is also valid!

      2. Sergey 10 hr later

         @beep @zachleat Ahahah!

2. Zach Leatherman 20 min later

   if an LLM generated the code, it should get full credit for the code

   1. Andrew Douglass 26 min later

      @zachleat credit maybe, but blame belongs to whoever submitted it.

      1. Zach Leatherman 36 min later

         @ardouglass merge commits!

   2. Private reply 27 min later
   3. Jay Hannah 23 hr later

      @zachleat I make a commit "generated by ChatGPT 4o from this prompt: ...". Then I make more commits fixing it.

      git blame shows me as the author, but with comments "ChatGPT 4o". Those comments are deleted if I end up re-writing it. 🤷

3. peter schilling 1 hr later

   @zachleat i appreciate that aider does this

   > Aider is tightly integrated with git so all of aider’s code changes are committed to the repo with proper attribution.

   https://aider.chat/docs/faq.html

   though admittedly this info is often lost through squash merges or rebases

4. Tony Mottaz 12 hr later

   @zachleat oops, it’s everyone’s fault

   1. Tony Mottaz 12 hr later

      @zachleat oh, you meant the code the LLM writes not like the contents of the LLM itself