29 replies

1. Random Geek 2 min later

   @zachleat Because we were all wild about branding so dry stuff would get attention, but we never generalized the enthusiasm or the branding!

   1. Zach Leatherman 4 min later

      @randomgeek better late than never!

2. Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 34 min later

   @zachleat Agreed! I had an idea for a CSS logo, a little tongue-in-cheek, but the simplicity works.

   I don't have it at hand but here's the idea:

   1. Zach Leatherman 47 min later

      @chriskirknielsen I like this very much

      1. Private reply 1 hr later
         1. Private reply 1 hr later
            1. Private reply 1 hr later
         2. Private reply 1 hr later
   2. Snugug 1 hr later

      @chriskirknielsen @zachleat love this

   3. Adam Argyle 1 hr later

      @chriskirknielsen @zachleat we need one for CSS4, CSS5, etc..! take a stab at adding a number or different color per each?

      1. Zach Leatherman 1 hr later

         @argyleink @chriskirknielsen I was hoping to have an unversioned logo first, if possible! If folks want versioned ones too, I’m not opposed!

      2. Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 1 hr later

         @argyleink @zachleat There's definitely room for a couple numbers (v9999 let's gooo). Looks a little like an element from a periodic table. I don't hate that, but is it CSS-y?

         1. Brett Peary 2 hr later

            @chriskirknielsen @argyleink @zachleat this State of CSS one is pretty css-y @sachagreif

            1. Brett Peary 2 hr later

               @chriskirknielsen @zachleat @sachagreif which @chriskirknielsen made I believe 😂

               1. Christopher Kirk-Nielsen 3 hr later

                  @brettpeary @zachleat @sachagreif

   4. Sophie 1 hr later

      @chriskirknielsen @zachleat love this

   5. Cassandrich 2 hr later

      @chriskirknielsen @zachleat Wait I thought that was the LaTeX logo?

      1. Zach Leatherman 2 hr later

         @dalias @chriskirknielsen the latex show with stephen colbert??

   6. Patrick Brosset 19 hr later

      @chriskirknielsen @zachleat could also just keep the same logos but increment the numbers 😂
      CSS4 anyone?

      https://codepen.io/captainbrosset/pen/qBgmbrz
      Plus, it uses web components!

      1. Zach Leatherman 19 hr later

         @patrickbrosset @chriskirknielsen the noise I made when I realized it handled multiple digits properly 🏆

3. Patrick Johanneson 🚀 🇨🇦 1 hr later

   @zachleat 5 minutes' editing in Gnu IMP got me this, which I personally kind of like.

   1. Zach Leatherman 1 hr later

      @pjohanneson ship it

      <!DOCTYPE logo>

      1. Patrick Johanneson 🚀 🇨🇦 1 hr later

         @zachleat dark mode: crtl-i

4. Anthony 2 hr later

   @zachleat Related: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4770 and https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1V3kyGahIl2P2i2J0dlHYhT97ssdfqyQuGpQtUar1aqE/edit

5. Lea Rosema 4 hr later

   @zachleat also, would appreciate HTML and CSS being a required skill in jobs rather than HTML5 and CSS3 🥺

   1. Zach Leatherman 5 hr later

      @lea it’s marketing time

6. Pascal 7 hr later

   @zachleat the w3c has this for html https://www.w3.org/html/logo/

   There’s also one for css3 but having a hard time finding the official page for it (on my phone at the moment)

   1. Zach Leatherman 7 hr later

      @pascal ah, for sure—the request here is for unversioned logos

      1. Pascal 8 hr later

         @zachleat oh I see, I misread “Why” as “Where”. And yeah I guess they were hyped about html5/css3 when they made these but it seems shortsighted in retrospect