I’ve started to notice that there is a very particular brand of tech influencer that almost exclusively conflates the technical merit of a thing with its money-making ability.
But the most efficient technical solution may not be the solution that makes the most money.
e.g. Fast builds are lost revenue for companies that charge for build time (aka the Jamstack paradox)
…and now I can’t unsee it.
30 replies
-
@zachleat there's usually an implied suggestion in there about precisely *who* it should be making money for, too
@zachleat the problem, as ever, is capitalism...
@patrick_h_lauke yeah… these folks definitely wear that badge on their sleeve
@zachleat Just wait 'till the "oh, these people confuse scale for quality!" hits.
@zachleat It's the struggle of software that is bucketted as a cost center. Anything "CI" falls in this bucket.
@zachleat Capitalism... doesn't incentivise the best solutions to societal requirements and instead subverts work from a goal of societal benefit into a goal to find the most efficient method of moving the most economic power possible?
Say it ain't so!
@zachleat I’m realizing slowly that I’ve bought into this brand of hype. Working on how to re-orient. Blood in the Machine (book) was an energizing wake up call.
@zachleat It is the same paradox as surgeons being paid per surgery.
If you are sick, they get richer. If you are healthy, they do not. But they need to have good enough results that you still go see them.
Weird eh!
@elevatebart I think the big difference is that physicians are taught from a solid ethical foundation
I’m reminded of: https://twitter.com/5imian/status/747817906939924482
@zachleat Dot matrix printers are ideal for a lot of use cases (any place the prints only text, like a hospital, pharmacy receipts, etc). They’re the printing solution that makes the least money for the manufacturer, but also the most cheap, sustainable, and convenient solution.
I was surprised to see so many in China, but it really got me thinking why we don’t use them as much back home.
@zachleat yes absolutely. Industrialization means dehumanization.
Big frameworks don’t want to adhere to certain standards or implement certain capabilities in order to be more compatible, because it is counter their business case. All projects that somehow depend on this will eventually crumble to the demands of capitalism, unless they remain small. Scaling is the leading difference.
Even more so, we celebrate tech projects selling to big companies as success.
@zachleat and as a tribe of people were so, so close to finally talking about it publicly. Yet we are still apologists for all of it.
We are not even calling out this nonsense. These tech influencers are going about their way, corrupting even more generations of website makers, and all we do is talk about them in code, so that they never know about it.
And yet last year remix people flat out attacked their „competitors“.
(Not implying you should name anyone, just saying)
@nachtfunke to which remix event are you referencing?
@zachleat ah as I get this notification I regrettably realize there were multiple, lemme see if I can find a reference.
@zachleat This is one reason I love my obscure little web host, NFSN. They charge for what you use and are just as happy to host low-resource static sites as complex server-side applications. https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/
@zachleat but zach, i thought capitalism was the most efficient system