it’s sad that no one cares about the time to second byte
46 replies
@zachleat There are so many bytes that always live in the shadow of the first one. But their work is still important. 💚🤖 We must never forget that. I'm glad you brought this up!
@bastianallgeier all bytes matter… wait
-
@fasterthanlime the fastest web site
@zachleat Life hack: fire a 0 over the wire as quickly as possible and then take 30 sec before sending anything else
@tomw this seems… not ideal 😅
@zachleat gonna write a little Apache module that responds with "HTTP" before even invoking the back end, making time-to-first-byte be, like, 9 milliseconds
@zachleat After the first byte, folks seem to lose their appetyte.
@jeremy Jeremy what have you done
@zachleat time to first megabyte of JavaScript
@simevidas can a sample size for a metric be too large
@zachleat Truly the middle child of bytes.
@zachleat The first byte is a Boomer. Second byte is GenX (who?). All subsequent bytes eat too much avocado toast.
@zachleat the time to first byte is taken with the eyes
What?
@zachleat sounds like you’ve got a new TED talk in the works to dethrone the dancing guy
@mattdsteele ha! I know this reference 🙌🏻
@zachleat this made me think of the schoolhouse rock
“I’m just a bill” but “I’m just a byte” and a sad looking second byte sitting there and getting a redemption arc@ksylor we need this
@zachleat u r so rtt abt this zach 😢
@zachleat People really should care a bit more.
I am a middle child
@zachleat so…children[1] ?
if (children.length === 3) return children[1]
@zachleat Do you find you click more with TTI?
@zachleat fellow middle child checking in 🫡
@zachleat super same
@zachleat Demand a :middle-child selector!
@phloe I’m very tempted even though I can’t remember needing this in practical work 😅