If jQuery in the early 2010s had the same paid advocacy that React currently has, we’d likely still be using jQuery for everything.
It’s time for the next era of front end—bring on Svelte, Solid, Marko, Lit, et al.
33 replies
I should write a blog post
-
@zachleat We would use jQuery and it would still be less of mess I guess.
@renestalder more or less messy is debatable! Almost certainly faster!
Now I’m imagining if jQuery had a JavaScript SSR evolution 👀
@zachleat Well maybe progressive enhancement would't have gone lost altogether, but we will never know. Somewhere in another meta universe there is probably a whole conference around a jQuerySelectorAll CSS-in-JS framework.
@renestalder I just felt a chill
@zachleat can confirm. I live in this next era and its quite nice.
@matt Say more!
@zachleat I no good with words, but I've been using Lit for years and I have felt no lack. I'm probably not best for making comparisons though, because I've never used React or Vue or anything, but I cannot imagine what people are saying when they say frameworks "make it easy" because I have felt like I've been missing anything I needed over the years, and its much easier to upgrade an adopted library than figure how to move up a framework major version tho the last I used of those was angularjs
@matt appreciate the elaboration! Don’t undervalue your experience!
@zachleat do you think any change will happen now that vercel pretty much funds both react and svelte? i guess the react craze/paid-advocacy may not change even then, though..
-
@mikestreety hell yeah Mike
@zachleat we ARE still using jQuery for everything. It’s on 75% of websites. JQuery is just like WordPress: everybody uses it, except people with loud voices who think they define what the web is.
@sil who you callin’ loud 😎
(well said!)
@zachleat obviously I myself love all the things that you build :) but most of the world and most of the web aren’t that enlightened. Jquery is really popular, except among people who don’t want it to be :)
@sil of course this thread was not an indictment of jQuery, of which I was and am still a fan 🥰
@zachleat of course, and you’re fully doing the right thing, and no accusation. I don’t use jq these days because browsers do it all natively, which was the point of jq from the beginning. You know this, of course, and I know you know it! But those following: you should know this too.
@zachleat to be fair, jQuery lives on in the browser because we now have built-in JS objects that were originally from jQuery.
@teacherbuknoy acquiescence to the platform was desirable by standards folks and the jQuery team—for whatever reason that does not appear to have happened with React