the worst parts of open source funding reflect a gig economy
Zach Leatherman 99 replies 1414 likes11 repost Original on MastodonOriginal on BlueskyAlso posted to Mastodon.
9 replies
@zachleat So… does that mean you’ll make a stop at the 7-Eleven to pick up a soda or is this the wrong time to ask?
@khalidabuhakmeh 7-11ty is allegedly open 23 hours a day (but not now)
@zachleat Don’t forget the parts that are like showing up at a jobsite and doing a bunch of work for free, all in the hope that some future work might actually be funded.
@TiroTypeworks this perspective doesn’t resonate with me, knowing my incentives and internal motivations as a maintainer (not an “external” contributor) but I am curious what you mean!
@zachleat There’s this notion in FOSS, which I have heard from numerous people over the years, that open software/font development is a service industry, so you make a thing, release it under an open license, and then customers come along and pay you to extend, modify, or customise it.
I’ve seen a lot of unfunded work done in that ‘make a thing’ phase. In some respects, this isn’t very different from any speculative development, except you’ve given away the thing that is most easily monetised, i.e. the rights, in the hope that a customer needs something a bit different and will pay you, rather than anyone else on the planet, to modify what you made.
[To be clear, I like FOSS, but development needs to be funded.]
@TiroTypeworks a ha, yes — that gives me a lot more detail and makes a lot more sense: thank you!
@TiroTypeworks The other wrinkle I think about a lot is how GIANT megacorps or investors can fund a free or near-free service at a loss to completely change the incentives of customers to be less friendly to existing creators trying to succeed sustainably in the same space.
Reminds me of Walmart/Amazon decimating the economy of small towns
@zachleat I’ve tried to describe this, in conversations with free software fundamentalists, in terms of disparity in ability to leverage value. What you describe is a particularly brutal way to leverage value from FOSS, but it is part of the larger issue that is simply stated as ‘Capital can leverage value at a scale and in ways that lack of capital can’t’. So when I release a font under OFL, I am aware that I am giving something to users — yay! —but I am also providing exploitable value to capital — boo!